relrel wrote: id actually like to take jennifer aniston by the shoulders and shake her uncontrollably until she promises to do something interesting. yes, she is pretty, but dammit...you are putting me to sleep with your safe hair and safe dresses. just for once i would like to see her in a colorful dress with her hair up. is that really too much to ask for? i don't want another lbd with her hair straight and parted in the middle. even her regular day outfits are booooooring as well. yes, i get it, you are classical and elegant but put some color in your life. perhaps that is why brad pitt left her...god knows that goddess jolie is way more interesting. I totally agree.
I agree too. But partly because i just dont buy Jennifer Aniston as America's Sweetheart. She was great as Rachel, but she always plays the same characters in my mind. She doesn't seem warm to me, or really all that interesting. And while her style could be classic if I truly thought she was interesting but didn't fuss about clothes, I wouldn't care- the same way that I allow Dolly Parton to be Dolly and just accept it and don't criticize- I don't feel that way. I just think of her as nice-ish but bland, and her clothing choices just perpetuate that for me.
I didn't like Reese's dress, I think it's very blah and matronly. I read it described as a dress suitable for someone in waiting to the Queen of England or something. I loved Michelle Williams apart from the crotch gathering. I think Keira could have done with a different hairstyle/colour and no huge ass necklace. Selma Hayek's hair was GORGEOUS! Jennifer Aniston was boring I think, and her dress was kind of bag lady from what I saw of it. Charlize's dress looks really cool from the side
-- Edited by kisa at 00:52, 2006-03-07
__________________
"...If I know my supermodels (and according to the half-dozen or so draped across my bed in a jenga of crack-glazed longing, I certainly do)"