I AM FURIOUS ABOUT THIS. HERE I AM NOT BEING ABLE TO VISIT FRIENDS BECAUSE OF THE PRICE OF GAS AND EXXON BREAKS PROFIT RECORDS!!!
DALLAS // Exxon Mobil Corp. posted record profits for any U.S. company today -- $10.71 billion for the fourth quarter and $36.13 billion for the year -- as the world's biggest publicly traded oil company benefited from high oil and natural-gas prices and solid demand for refined products.
The results exceeded Wall Street expectations and Exxon shares rose, but some lawmakers expressed outrage at the industry's latest profit surge, renewing calls for a windfall profits tax and increased investment in alternative fuels.
The company's earnings amounted to $1.71 per share for the October-December quarter, up 27 percent from $8.42 billion, or $1.30 per share, in the year ago quarter. The result topped the then-record quarterly profit of $9.92 billion Exxon posted in the third quarter of 2005.
Exxon's profit for the year was also the largest annual reported net income in U.S. history, according to Howard Silverblatt, a senior index analyst for Standard & Poor's. He said the previous high was Exxon's $25.3 billion profit in 2004.
"What do you expect when you combine record oil and gas prices and strong operations everywhere else?" said analyst Fadel Gheit at Oppenheimer & Co. "Unless prices collapse, earnings in 2006 will make 2005 look like a cake walk."
The company said its average sale price for crude oil in the U.S. during the quarter was $52.23 a barrel, compared with $38.85 a year earlier. It sold natural gas in the U.S., on average, for $11.34 per 1,000 cubic feet, compared with $6.61 during the same period a year ago.
Exxon's vice president of investor relations Henry Hubble said that while strong commodity prices clearly helped drive the record earnings, the company also deserved credit for its ability to complete projects on time while keeping costs in check.
"We continue to identify world-class projects, post industry-leading returns, and are well-placed for continued growth," Hubble told analysts in a conference call. "Our record results show a disciplined approach and we continue to deliver superior value to our shareholders."
Exxon's results lifted the combined 2005 profits for the country's three largest integrated oil companies to more than $63 billion.
ConocoPhillips said last Wednesday that its fourth-quarter earnings rose 51 percent to $3.68 billion, while annual income climbed 66 percent to $13.53 billion. Two days later, Chevron Corp. said its fourth-quarter earnings rose 20 percent to $4.14 billion, while annual income jumped 6 percent to $14.1 billion.
The oil industry's stellar results have renewed talk for a windfall profit tax that would push companies to invest more in new production and refining capacity.
Sen. Barbara Boxer, a California Democrat who sharply criticized oil executives appearing before Congress in November, on Friday called on the Bush administration and the Federal Trade Commission to "put an end to gouging." She then suggested that FTC stood for "Friend to Chevron."
Sen. Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat who proposed an extra tax on oil company profits in November, said Monday that "the federal government has a responsibility to make sure that these companies continue to innovate instead of just profiting from the status quo."
But John Felmy, chief economist for the American Petroleum Institute, a Washington-based trade group, said Monday that the political rhetoric was "not a case based on fact."
"We invested somewhere in the order of $86 billion last year," Felmy said. "Then we have to treat investors appropriately; otherwise we'd have the Eliot Spitzers of the world coming after us."
Analysts said they are not worried about any fallout from potential pressure coming from Capitol Hill.
"I hope the capitalist system would promote and applaud the hard work of companies that have been smart and lucky to achieve good earnings for shareholders," said Tina Vital, another analyst for S&P.
The results for Exxon's latest quarter included a $390 million gain related to a litigation settlement. Excluding special items, earnings were $10.32 billion, or $1.65 per share. The result topped Wall Street's expectations. Analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial predicted earnings of $1.44 per share.
Exxon shares rose $1.82, or almost 3 percent, to close at $63.11 on the New York Stock Exchange. That is near the upper end of its 52-week trading range of $51.35 to $65.96.
Quarterly revenue ballooned to $99.66 billion from $83.37 billion a year ago but came in shy of the $100.72 billion Exxon posted in the third quarter, which was the first time a U.S. public company generated more than $100 billion in sales in a single quarter.
By segment, exploration and production earnings rose sharply to $7.04 billion, up $2.15 billion from the 2004 quarter, reflecting higher crude oil and natural gas prices. Production decreased by 1 percent due to the lingering effects of hurricanes Katrina and Rita, which battered the Gulf Coast in August and September.
The company's refining and marketing segment reported $2.39 billion in earnings, as higher refining and marketing margins helped offset the residual effects of the hurricanes.
Exxon's chemicals business saw earnings, excluding special items, decline by $413 million to $835 million, as higher materials costs squeezed margins.
For the full year, net income surged to $5.71 per share from $3.89 per share in 2004. Annual revenue grew to $371 billion from $298.04 billion.
To put that into perspective, Exxon's revenue for the year exceeded Saudi Arabia's estimated 2005 gross domestic product of $340.5 billion, according to statistics maintained by the Central Intelligence Agency.
Seashells-what bothers me so much is that although this is a capitalistic economy, energy (via gasoline or natural gas) is not an optional purchase - so we are at the mercy of the oil companies. The industry to me seems to be a monopoly-there is no competition and from what I understand it's not a problem at the pumps. Retailers have an extremely small margin-it's at the wholesale/distribution level. Alternative fuel options are intriquing, but unfortunately, are more expensive than crude oil at this point. In Phoenix, public transportation is miserably inadequate. Americans need a complete paradigm shift in transportation-but how to accomplish that? I remember the move to economy cars in the 70's which we have steadily moved away from and back to the big gas guzzlers. But at this point even hybrid cars are too expensive to return the investment in gas savings. In the southwest, it would be brilliant to have a massive/cost effective system to harness solar energy and mass distribute that (since we have sun at least 300 days a year if not more) - but that is not even close to being the case. With limited oil supplies left in the world and with the oil companies price gouging consumers perhaps some effective innovation will finally be able to be put into practical use.
In President Bush's state of the union address he takes note of the situation by saying we need to decrease our reliance on oil. Well how can we do that. Oil is used to make our plastics, fuel our automobiles, and run our homes.
The President needs ensure some tax breaks for alternative energy sources, but due to his ties with Big Oil corporations in the United States and their ties overseas (IRAQ), this is not going to happen- if special interest groups have their way.
I was doing research on home energy savings for a client at work and Solar panels for your home are at least 20k. Very few households can afford that, not to mention the Southwest, where you live, can really be the only places to totally utilize them. In the Northeast, where I am, we have to have combination systems.
And Hybrids aren't the answer yet. The batteries cost 2k alone to replace and they only last about 2 years. Do you save that in gas? Probably, but I don't think I want to pay that 2k out all at once!
Oil Companies- for all intensive purposes- can be qualified as an oligopoly. A few companies doing the price collusion and fixing- clearly seen in Exxon's excess profits. I don't know about you, but my business teacher told me this was illegal.