STYLETHREAD -- LET'S TALK SHOP!

Meow · Coach

Hmmmmmmmm...

laken1 · Hermes

Whoa - I'll be looking forward to the actual article in Vanity Fair to make sure this is true....But I must admit, if that is the case, those pictures would have been the thing that totally pushed me over the edge too.....

Drew · Gucci

SCANDALOUS!

RyanJ · Coach

Man, Now I am starting to actually like Jen and dislike Brad. I don't like cheaters.

-- Edited by RyanJ at 10:16, 2005-06-15

scarlett · Marc Jacobs

wow, that sounds like a pretty explosive interview, and so opposite from what brad has been saying. vanity fair did a cover story with angelina pretty recently too.

honey · Gucci

this reeks of a pr move on the part of conde nast. (sorry i know i always sound like a conspiracy theorist) but several things seem not quite right in this story.

first everything in page six should be taken with a boulder of salt, since they've been known to embellish stories in the past.

second both W and Vanity Fair are conde nast publications, and if anything this story seems like it's an attempt to raise the profile of both mags, and put money in conde's pockets by capitalizing on the drama of brangelina. placing it makes people w go out and get the current issue of W b/c of the photos and then creates advance pr for an upcoming issue of VF. i wouldn't be surprised if the VF story ends up being much less juicy than what they're advertising here. both jen & brad have said in the past that the split was not over kids, and i doubt jen will actually accuse brad of cheating in the article (though it could happen). so it just seems like one big teaser.

RyanJ · Coach

honey wrote:

this reeks of a pr move on the part of conde nast. (sorry i know i always sound like a conspiracy theorist) but several things seem not quite right in this story.
first everything in page six should be taken with a boulder of salt, since they've been known to embellish stories in the past.
second both W and Vanity Fair are conde nast publications, and if anything this story seems like it's an attempt to raise the profile of both mags, and put money in conde's pockets by capitalizing on the drama of brangelina. placing it makes people w go out and get the current issue of W b/c of the photos and then creates advance pr for an upcoming issue of VF. i wouldn't be surprised if the VF story ends up being much less juicy than what they're advertising here. both jen & brad have said in the past that the split was not over kids, and i doubt jen will actually accuse brad of cheating in the article (though it could happen). so it just seems like one big teaser.

Why do you have to ruin it for us?

dot · Marc Jacobs

honey wrote:

this reeks of a pr move on the part of conde nast. (sorry i know i always sound like a conspiracy theorist) but several things seem not quite right in this story.
first everything in page six should be taken with a boulder of salt, since they've been known to embellish stories in the past.
second both W and Vanity Fair are conde nast publications, and if anything this story seems like it's an attempt to raise the profile of both mags, and put money in conde's pockets by capitalizing on the drama of brangelina. placing it makes people w go out and get the current issue of W b/c of the photos and then creates advance pr for an upcoming issue of VF. i wouldn't be surprised if the VF story ends up being much less juicy than what they're advertising here. both jen & brad have said in the past that the split was not over kids, and i doubt jen will actually accuse brad of cheating in the article (though it could happen). so it just seems like one big teaser.

I totally agree with honey. All that hype over that Desperate Housewives article/shoot was so outrageous. That article was complete fluff. There wasn't one thing in there that wasn't just "hype" and that I hadn't hear about 500x from every celebrity focus magazine and tv show a week before it hit newstands.