Elton John Ties the Knot With Partner Dec 21, 8:12 AM EST
The Associated Press
WINDSOR, England -- Pop star Elton John and his longtime love David Furnish became one of England's first legally bound gay couples Wednesday in a low-key ceremony followed by celebrity-studded bash.
John, 58, and Furnish, 43, were among hundreds of same-sex couples taking advantage of a new British law offering same-sex couples a legal status similar to marriage. The law took effect on Wednesday in England and Wales. Ceremonies were held earlier this week in Northern Ireland and Scotland.
Fans turned up before sunrise in the cobbled streets around Windsor's town hall, the Guildhall, where Prince Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles wed in April. Cameras flickered as the couple — John wearing purple spectacles and a black suit — walked out arm-in-arm, waving to the crowd.
The couple drove off in a black Rolls Royce for a lunch followed by a glitzy reception to be attended by more than 700 guests.
"I think it's amazing — it's brilliant," said Tim Alcock, 43, one of dozens of onlookers.
Prime Minister Tony Blair, speaking to reporters at a news conference, wished the couple well and congratulated them for exercising their newfound legal right. Gay rights activists saw the union as milestone in gay rights movement.
Peter Tatchell, spokesman for the gay and lesbian human rights group OutRage! said the wedding "would raise the profile of gay love and commitment."
"Their same-sex civil partnership ceremony will be reported all over the world including in countries where news about gay issues is normally never reported," he said. "This will give hope to millions of isolated, vulnerable, lesbian and gay people especially those living in repressive and homophobic countries."
The new law — passed last year despite some opposition from Parliament's unelected House of Lords — allows civil ceremonies that will give same-sex couples the same social security, tax, pension and inheritance rights as married couples.
Furnish, a Canadian-born filmmaker, and John have been together for 12 years.
Both acknowledged that their ceremony might have broader ramifications.
"As far as I'm concerned I've always considered myself committed to Elton and he's the person that I want to spend the rest of my life with. So in that sense I don't feel like the dynamic of our relationship is going to change," Furnish told Attitude magazine. "But from a social standpoint, I think it's hugely significant. It is a major, major change. It is one of the defining issues of our times."
After the ceremony the couple headed for a lunch with their family to be followed by a reception — costing an estimated $1.75 million — where pink champagne and lamb would be served to hundreds of celebrity guests inside two giant white tents that have been erected on the grounds of the pop star's Windsor mansion.
Their morning ceremony, in contrast, was low-key with only John's mother and stepfather and Furnish's parents reportedly in attendance.
Guests at the couple's bachelor night on Monday included heavy metal rocker turned reality TV star Ozzy Osbourne and his wife Sharon, model and actress Liz Hurley and musicians Bryan Adams, Gary Barlow and Kid Rock.
John, who was married once before to studio engineer Renate Blauel, is known for such songs as "Crocodile Rock" and "Rocket Man." He was also a very close friend of Princess Diana, who died in a car crash in Paris in 1997, and was knighted in 1998 — an honor he described as the pinnacle of his decades-long career.
"It's a long time coming really," said Suzi Uprichard, 33, of Maidenhead, who was in the crowd in Windsor. She said she was excited to be part of what she described as a historic day for same-sex couples.
Other couples tying the knot Wednesday included actor Sir Antony Sher, 56, and his partner Greg Doran, 47, who wed at Islington Town Hall in north London.
Three couples signed their documents moments after the register office opened at 8 a.m. in Brighton, the south coast city known as Britain's gay capital.
"I'm really excited! I'm very happy to be one of the first," said Gino Meriano, who was with his partner Mike Ullett.
The Netherlands, Canada, Belgium and Spain have legalized same-sex marriage, while Germany, France and Switzerland have laws similar to Britain's. In the United States, only Massachusetts allows gay marriage, while Vermont and Connecticut permit civil unions.
ok, now, there is no division between church and government in England... does this mean that the Church of England condones homosexuality? just curious....
__________________
"Fashion can be bought. Style one must possess." ~ Edna Woolman Chase
detroit wrote: ok, now, there is no division between church and government in England... does this mean that the Church of England condones homosexuality? just curious....
I think the CoE is still fairly close to the RC Church in that it recognizes that homosexuality exists and says that gay people are welcome in the Church and loved by God etc. etc. but sex is something that is exclusively for married couples and marriage is specifically a union between a man and a woman. I'm not sure how close the link between the CoE and the government is but I got the impression that the Queen is head of the Church in name only and while she appoints the Archbishops they pretty much do their own thing.
ETA: Statement by House of Bishops on this civil union law:
" ‘Sexual intercourse, as an expression of faithful intimacy, properly belongs within marriage exclusively,’ the statement says. Marriage, it states, ‘is a creation ordinance, a gift of God in creation and a means of his grace. Marriage, defined as a faithful, committed, permanent and legally sanctioned relationship between a man and a woman, is central to the stability and health of human society.’
The statement notes that the new legislation makes no change to the law in relation to marriage and that the Government has stated that it has no intention of introducing ‘same-sex’ marriage....
'....In addition, the House of Bishops affirms that clergy of the Church of England should not provide services of blessing for those who register a civil partnership.’ "
If you read the statement it says that a heterosexual couple can also become a partnership under this new civil union law but it seems like it doesn't matter whether the couple is heterosexual or homosexual, the CoE isn't going to bless the union.
detroit wrote: ok, now, there is no division between church and government in England... does this mean that the Church of England condones homosexuality? just curious.... I think the CoE is still fairly close to the RC Church in that it recognizes that homosexuality exists and says that gay people are welcome in the Church and loved by God etc. etc. but sex is something that is exclusively for married couples and marriage is specifically a union between a man and a woman. I'm not sure how close the link between the CoE and the government is but I got the impression that the Queen is head of the Church in name only and while she appoints the Archbishops they pretty much do their own thing. ETA: Statement by House of Bishops on this civil union law: " ‘Sexual intercourse, as an expression of faithful intimacy, properly belongs within marriage exclusively,’ the statement says. Marriage, it states, ‘is a creation ordinance, a gift of God in creation and a means of his grace. Marriage, defined as a faithful, committed, permanent and legally sanctioned relationship between a man and a woman, is central to the stability and health of human society.’ The statement notes that the new legislation makes no change to the law in relation to marriage and that the Government has stated that it has no intention of introducing ‘same-sex’ marriage.... '....In addition, the House of Bishops affirms that clergy of the Church of England should not provide services of blessing for those who register a civil partnership.’ " If you read the statement it says that a heterosexual couple can also become a partnership under this new civil union law but it seems like it doesn't matter whether the couple is heterosexual or homosexual, the CoE isn't going to bless the union. -- Edited by cc at 16:13, 2005-12-23
this issue became conversation during an outing tonight - and what you posted seems to be the take that others had as well. really, good for them - if two people want a legal agreement let them have it, regardless of gender - I think it can only have a positive effect on society. I was just thinking back to a wedding I went to in England, and how all the legal paperwork was completed at the alter - considering that the legal union would not receive the blessing of the church, that makes more sense. I don't see any reason why we can't do the same thing here...
__________________
"Fashion can be bought. Style one must possess." ~ Edna Woolman Chase
i just heard the funniest/saddest thing today from my bf's mom. she works at a grocery store as a check out woman and last night two girls (early to mid twenties) were in her line checking out and they were talking about elton john. however....the one asked the other who the GIRL was that he married and why neither of them know this GIRL'S name. they both thought elton john married a GIRL!!!! oh my good lord, what sort of rock were they living under?
__________________
"But I want you to remember, I intend this breast satirically." Susan from Coupling